Hi Till, I added slightly modified draft to http://wiki.openindiana.org/oi/Code+of+Conduct+proposals and it contains the sentence you wanted, but slightly modified and expanded:
Always seek to maintain a welcoming environment for new contributors.
• Welcome new people to the project and guide them in their
contributions.
• Give them the time you were given when you first joined the community.
• And if you weren't given enough time please set a new example for
others to live by.
Modifications come from former OSOL CoC. I hope you like this even better.
Cheers,
Adam
> On Jul 20, 2016, at 10:04 AM, Till Wegmüller <toaster...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 18.07.2016 23:35, Adam Števko wrote:
>>
>> Please compose your thoughts and comment with as few replies as
>> necessary so the community may solidify the final text of this document.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Adam
>>
>
> Hi Adam, Hi Nikola
>
> Thanks both of you for the work put into this.
>
> Here are my thought and comments:
> When reading Adams text it refers to a body of Leadership. Both source
> Projects (FreeBSD and FiFo) have such a Role defined. Do we have that?
>
> Adams text is more worded towards being a set of rules. Nikolas more in the
> sense of expectations. I prefer expectations.
>
> When I read the words "will not be tolerated" it imediatly raises the
> question what will hapen if i break those? Who punishes and how? In my
> opinion "Discouraged behaviour" is the better wording.
>
> I prefer the managing misuse and escalation section over the reporting
> violations. We have a very friendly community. There should not be a need to
> involve a third party to resolve issues from the very beginning.
>
> The very notion of twitter is that everything is public.
>
> I find the point "Maintain welcoming environment for new contributors and
> guide them in contributions." very important. I would like to have that in.
>
> What is the desired outcome of a code of conduct? Should it be a set of
> rules? Or a set of expectations from each other? Is it assumed to be the same
> for all codes of conducts? If so should we link to that definition? or do we
> need to define that?
>
>
> Greetings
> Till
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> oi-dev mailing list
> oi-dev@openindiana.org
> http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
_______________________________________________ oi-dev mailing list oi-dev@openindiana.org http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
