On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 4:13 PM, WebDawg <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Mon, Aug 1, 2016 at 5:00 AM, Adam Števko <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> any more comments on this? >> >> http://wiki.openindiana.org/oi/Code+of+Conduct+proposals - Modified >> proposed version >> http://wiki.openindiana.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=31391953 - >> Nikola’s version >> >> Cheers, >> Adam >> >> > > Do you really want a group of people assigned to disciplining people, in the > dark? How about anonymous complaints, but on an open forum? There should > be a POC to complain, but if you want the project to be 'open' should not > every thing be open? > > > I would combine this: > > Give them the time you were given when you first joined the community. > And if you weren't given enough time please set a new example for others to > live by. > > Give them the time you were given when you first joined the community; even > if you weren't given enough time please set a new example for others to live > by. > > > If you want a sub bullet to this, this may be better: > > Be open and transparent so others can participate on an equal footing and > contribute to the project in their own way. > > This is an OPEN project. Everyone has something to contribute! > > > Repeated complaining (rehashing) of closed (decided) issues. > > I would just remove the word complaining.... > > Repeated rehashing of closed/decided issues. > > What do you really mean by this?: > > > Participants who disrupt the collaborative space, or participate in a > pattern of behavior which could be considered harassment. > > I was at a hackerspace once and I asked a lot of questions, this could be > considered harassment. Do you mean bullying?? > > Nikola's seems similar to what is already there for the first section. The > second two are different. > > Does OpenIndiana have anything like this?: > https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/Arch_Linux#Principles > > If you are introducing someone to a code of conduct I think it would be very > important to introduce them to the rules under the hood and also give them > links on ways to contribute.
The links to contribute were the ones posted by Adam. > > I have also received no reply on the wiki vs website. I have not also > received any information on if the Openindiana documentation project is > still alive/moving forward. <snip> Can someone tell me which wiki/web page we are supposed to be looking at? http://www.openindiana.org/community/code-of-conduct/ -> reference document published for proposal, not editable. -> work on drafts happens on the Wiki as described on the webpage. http://wiki.openindiana.org/oi/Code+of+Conduct+proposals -> work in progress draft based on Adam and Michael's proposal http://wiki.openindiana.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=31391953 -> work in progress draft based on Nikola's proposal </snip> Originally both versions were presented together on one page but Nikola preferred to have them separated. > > It would suck to see the project documentation/content split between site > and wiki, everything would be so confusing. Don't you guys want to work > something out on this note? The Wiki and Docs website serve two different purposes: - the Wiki is for developer's notes which are by definition moving targets: these notes can be the basis of new content for the end user documentation. - the Docs website is for user documentation and should be fed with content by pull-requests. This solution makes it possible to deploy the documentation (e.g. Handbook) in various formats which is impossible with the Wiki. > > > _______________________________________________ > oi-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev -- --- Praise the Caffeine embeddings _______________________________________________ oi-dev mailing list [email protected] http://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
