-------- Пересылаемое сообщение --------
От кого: Мартин Бохниг <[email protected]>
Кому: Discussion list for OpenIndiana <[email protected]>
Копия: Apostolos Syropoulos <[email protected]>, bentahyr 
<[email protected]>, a.jung <[email protected]>
Дата: Воскресенье, 11 сентября 2016, 16:13 UTC
Тема: The compatibility PARADOX of the old versus the new i915 DRM(and now KMS 
submodule) kernel driver on newer (but not too new) versus older chipsets


@@@@@The compatibility PARADOX of the old versus the new i915 DRM(and now KMS 
submodule) kernel driver on newer (but not too new) versus older chipsets @@@@@

In the old OpenSolaris days the Sun Beijing team ported Intel-DRM to 
OpenSolaris (in about 2006 with incremental updates until 2010 [and behind the 
firewall till 2013]), not for all chipsets by all vendors as offered on LinUX, 
but at least for the most widespread vendor: Intel.


For historic Sun announcements see:

###1.######################################################(((((old radeon 
pciids???)))))
### https://blogs.oracle.com/erwann/entry/ati_support_for_compiz_easy
### https://blogs.oracle.com/erwann/entry/compiz_integrated_in_opensolaris_2008
### 
http://pkg.openindiana.org/legacy/manifest/0/[email protected],5.11-0.96%3A20080825T194737Z
### 
http://web.archive.org/web/20090107043722/http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/xwin-discuss/2007-December/002689.html
### 
http://web.archive.org/web/20091006235709/http://opensolaris.org/os/project/dri


Now, for OpenSolaris this meant that by August 2010 updates stopped streaming 
in.
The so far supported chipsets stayed supported in Illumos based distros (had 
functioning DRM, but no KMS and hence could run native hw-accelerated Xorg 
intel_drv.so ddx's until version 2.9 and could run compiz, *BUT* due to the 
lack of KMS couldn't run any kms-only intel_drv.so Xorg ddx, which meant that 
2010's version 2.9 was the newest one could use.

This applied to the following chipsets:

Intel(R) Integrated Graphics Chipsets:
        i810, i810-dc100, i810e, i815, i830M, 845G, 854, 852GM/855GM, 865G,
        915G, E7221 (i915), 915GM, 945G, 945GM, 945GME, Pineview GM,
        Pineview G, 965G, G35, 965Q, 946GZ, 965GM, 965GME/GLE, G33, Q35, Q33,
        GM45, 4 Series, G45/G43, Q45/Q43, G41, B43


... while all the newer now on-die incorporated Intel-GPU's on Sandy, Ivy, 
Haswell and some Valleyview-Atoms were completely unsupported until my backport 
and were left to run vesa_drv.so 


When I performed the backport my primary testing and debugging focus were 
obviously those platforms, which didn't have any DRM let alone DRM/KMS support 
at all: Those modern ones with on-cpu-die integrated GPU's: Sandy, Ivy, 
Haswell, Atom-Valleyview (newer hardware is not yet supported by Oracle's 
original driver port).

And I had been proud that I got it running there on Sandy, Ivy and Haswell and 
simply expected the older chipsets to function (didn't have such older testing 
hardware for i8xx or i9xx etc.


Now we saw three users reporting black screens on such older laptops/Netbooks.
And Ben was the one who finally posted enough output which proved it that there 
is indeed a problem on 
Intel(R) Integrated Graphics Chipsets:
        i810, i810-dc100, i810e, i815, i830M, 845G, 854, 852GM/855GM, 865G,
        915G, E7221 (i915), 915GM, 945G, 945GM, 945GME, Pineview GM,
        Pineview G, 965G, G35, 965Q, 946GZ, 965GM, 965GME/GLE, G33, Q35, Q33,
        GM45, 4 Series, G45/G43, Q45/Q43, G41, B43

and which, see my response here:  
https://openindiana.org/pipermail/openindiana-discuss/2016-September/019436.html

Now, to come to the point: I found a hardware freak on ebay who has rooms full 
of old computers and he permitted me to perform a few test runs, if I would buy 
one of these old Laptops, which I did.
It is indeed true that on the older chipsets the backport resulted in a black 
screen, each time with the following in syslog:

WARNING: [drm:drm_agp_rw_gtt:629] AGPIOC_RW_GTT failed 6



And the good news while getting this fixed via either enhancing the agpgart 
stack and/or preventing the drm submodule from referencing AGPIOC_RW_GTT is, 
that now as I finally have such incompatible testing hardware myself, I could 
test a long set of things which I can't describe here in a minuite.

But the interesting finding is, that by copying over Sol11.3's


./
./kernel/
./kernel/misc/
./kernel/misc/amd64/
./kernel/misc/amd64/agpmaster
./kernel/drv/
./kernel/drv/amd64/
./kernel/drv/amd64/amd64_gart
./kernel/drv/amd64/agpgart
./kernel/drv/amd64/agptarget
./kernel/drv/agpgart.conf


the same problematic backport bins suddenly do work *fine* on Hipster.
BTW, 11.0 and 11.1 agp* bins don't result in a working scenario and 11.2 I so 
far didn't test.
But while this is of course a test I could only perform on my private computer 
at the same time it shows that not something else in the kernel is breaking 
functionality.
This means, in a few days you get the final repair diff from me.
At this time I have 2 strategies: 1st enhancing agpgart* and friends.
But what is discouraging me is the fact, that the agpgart* Sol11.1 bins which I 
expected to be 100% identical to the 11.3 agpgart* bins do *not* solve the 
problem on my private test laptop, only 11.3 does.
So rather I may be requred to test it the other way around: To get rid of 
AGPIOC_RW_GTT all together in the drm/kms module.

Mor on that in a few days.
Please do not waste your time with testing the old bins on those older
Intel(R) Integrated Graphics Chipsets:
        i810, i810-dc100, i810e, i815, i830M, 845G, 854, 852GM/855GM, 865G,
        915G, E7221 (i915), 915GM, 945G, 945GM, 945GME, Pineview GM,
        Pineview G, 965G, G35, 965Q, 946GZ, 965GM, 965GME/GLE, G33, Q35, Q33,
        GM45, 4 Series, G45/G43, Q45/Q43, G41, B43
platforms until I create a modified test iso (with the new yet to be fixed test 
bins added to alp's Hipster iso).


This is today's i915 update.
Now finally some time for vbox - more from me in 8 hours.

TNX to all who reported for your testing work so far :)



best regards,
%martin bochnig


-- 
Мартин Бохниг
----------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
oi-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev

Reply via email to