Hi

My Choice would also fall to 2 or 3. I am tending more to 3 if we do not
want to regenerate it more often. For 2 if we want to generate it every
once in a while and only resort to number 1 if regenerating headers for
gtk will be a regular thing like with autoconf.


Hope this helps
Greetings
Till

On 26.06.2018 17:35, Пыхалов Александр Владимирович via oi-dev wrote:
> Hi.
> 
> I've been fighting with lightdm-gtk-greeter as after last update it looks 
> ugly .
> 
> It seems in lightdm-gtk-greeter.glade "osd" style should be removed and 
> lightdm-gtk-greeter-2.0.5/src/lightdm-gtk-greeter-ui.h should be regenerated. 
> To regenerate it, I need exo-csource, which is a part of 
> https://github.com/xfce-mirror/exo, which has several XFCE dependencies.
> 
> I see several options:
> - create components for all XFCE dependencies and exo (a lot of mostly 
> useless work);
> - create component just for exo-csource  (this can be just a really small 
> component, and it can even be renamed if we want to avoid conflict with full 
> exo library);
> - compile it manually and create patches to generated files.
> 
> So far I think about second approach as it is not extremely rude, but allows 
> to minimise time spent on it. What do you think?
> 
> Best regards, 
> Alexander Pyhalov, 
> system administrator of Southern Federal University IT department
> 
> _______________________________________________
> oi-dev mailing list
> oi-dev@openindiana.org
> https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
> 

_______________________________________________
oi-dev mailing list
oi-dev@openindiana.org
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
  • [oi-... Пыхалов Александр Владимирович via oi-dev
    • ... Till Wegmüller
    • ... Michal Nowak

Reply via email to