Am 27.03.21 um 16:59 schrieb [email protected]:
The shared-macros.mk in oi-userland/make-rules could do:

shared-macros.mk:REQUIRED_PACKAGES += shell/ksh93

where it is currently doing

shared-macros.mk:REQUIRED_PACKAGES += SUNWcs

Currently on an older OpenIndiana system I have:

$ pkg search /usr/bin/sh
INDEX      ACTION VALUE      PACKAGE
path       link   usr/bin/sh pkg:/[email protected]
path       link   usr/bin/sh pkg:/shell/[email protected]

$ ls -l /bin/sh
lrwxrwxrwx   1 root     root           9 Sep 16  2020 /bin/sh -> i86/ksh93

So if a component provides a script with /bin/sh it requires either SUNWcs or 
shell/ksh93.

But the oi-userland/make-rules/shared-macros.mk modification could perhaps deal 
with most cases.
You are right. But probobly I wasn't explicit enough: The main question
is how to deal with
the situation. Changing so many packages would take some time and occupy
the build server for a while.
So maybe it would be better to update the build server to the latest
osnet-incorporation now
and change package dependencies when needed, eg. when we touch a package
anyways.
But that would also render some (all?) actual PR's buggy and they have
to be redone.


----- Op 27 mar 2021 om 16:13 schreef gary mills [email protected]:

On Sat, Mar 27, 2021 at 09:41:12AM +0100, Andreas Wacknitz wrote:

illumos-gate has recently merged the following changes
     2755 split ksh93 from core package
     13460 ksh93 tests should be moved out of usr/demo
     518 ksh documentation should be moved out of SUNWcsr

This has impacts on our REQUIRED_PACKAGES settings for many packages.
Most, if not all occurrences of
     REQUIRED_PACKAGES += SUNWcs
need to be replaced by
     REQUIRED_PACKAGES += shell/ksh93
Is that really true?  I would have thought that all products would
require SUNWcs, but only ones that included ksh scripts would require
shell/ksh93 .  The problem is that you can't tell which to change from
the REQUIRED_PACKAGES make variable.  Is there not a default for that
variable?  Maybe adding both packages would be a quick fix, although
it's incorrect in many cases.  Is there a way to determine which
products actually require the shell/ksh93 package?


--
-Gary Mills-            -refurb-                -Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada-

_______________________________________________
oi-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev
_______________________________________________
oi-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev


_______________________________________________
oi-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://openindiana.org/mailman/listinfo/oi-dev

Reply via email to