Hugh, Sorry for not responding sooner.
Hugh Macdonald <[email protected]> wrote: > We've done our own link between OCIO and OIIO (as a part of oiiotool). Excellent! Any chance on sharing what you've done? (not as a formal pull request necessarily, even as a branch, or a conceptual overview would be appreciated). I'm curious what route you've taken. I just pushed an initial implementation to maketx which adds (limited) ocio support: https://github.com/jeremyselan/oiio/tree/ocio I haven't yet commit the makefile support. I'm looking into the cleanest way to add OCIO as an optional dependency. My current plan is that no matter whether OIIO is built with OCIO support, the OIIO header / public symbols would remain identical. And that the OCIO classes would not be exposed other than as opaque predeclarations. We'll see if this is possible. (i'll address data window questions in another email). -- Jeremy _______________________________________________ Oiio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org
