Hi!
On 03/04/2012 19:20, Larry Gritz wrote:
I had no idea Debian supported to many architectures!
Eheh... we aim to dominate the entire world ;-)
Hmmm... it seems that most of these failures are due to lack of TBB
support for those architectures. TBB is optional for us; we really
only need it for the implementation of atomic_int and atomic_long,
and we have fallbacks for gcc. Could you try again, setting the
CMake variable USE_TBB to OFF?
Done... and it fails even so, as you can see at [1].
Different issue, this time.
Some have argued that we should simply excise TBB and use only
gcc/win32 intrinsics for our atomics. I think the only reason we
haven't done this is worries about performance (especially on
Windows), but I will prepare a test and post about that separately.
If there's no performance penalty, maybe it's time to be done with
TBB.
Good! Let's see how it can be handled... and if it's worth switching.
-- lg
Cheers.
[1]
http://debomatic-kbsd64.debian.net/unstable/pool/openimageio_1.0.2+dfsg0-1/openimageio_1.0.2+dfsg0-1.buildlog
--
Matteo F. Vescovi
Debian Sponsored Maintainer
GnuPG KeyID: 83B2CF7A
_______________________________________________
Oiio-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org
