On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 8:28 AM, Matteo F. Vescovi <[email protected]>wrote:
> Hi Richard! > > On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 08:15:12AM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote: > > Does that patch replace the need for the patch I referenced? > > I must admit I didn't give a chance to that patch, since the one I used > covered not only s390(x) architecture but at least more 4-5 failing > architectures in Debian buildd because of atomics. > And it works fine, as you can see at [1]. > That would be nice... I'll share it with the secondary arch team for Fedora. I only have access to the i686 and x86_64 buildsystem. > > Does it only work for gcc 4.8? > > Well, as explained in [2] by the submitter, g++-4.8 is required since > it's the only version providing the atomic support. > > Interesting, are these REAL atomics, or workarounds for these arches? The GCC atomics wiki page[1] doesn't say that ppc64 has atomics... In either case, that will only work on F19+ since F18 is still on gcc 4.7... Thanks, Richard [1] http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/Atomic
_______________________________________________ Oiio-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org
