Jonathan, did you get a chance to look at this pull request?  Does that solve 
any problems for you?

        -- lg


On Jun 22, 2013, at 9:49 AM, Larry Gritz wrote:

> Check out this pull request, and try it out if you have a chance.  I'm 
> curious if it solves the problem for you.
> 
> https://github.com/OpenImageIO/oiio/pull/621
> 
> 
> On Jun 17, 2013, at 4:54 PM, Jonathan Egstad wrote:
> 
>> Thanks!
>> 
>> -jonathan
>> 
>> On Jun 17, 2013, at 4:22 PM, Larry Gritz wrote:
>> 
>>> I think I can make things easier for you on this front.  Let me see what I 
>>> can throw together.  Stay tuned.
>>> 
>>> In the mean time, I think you can probably make headway by compiling OIIO 
>>> with a simple modification to src/libOpenImageIO/CMakeLists.txt -- just 
>>> comment out line 123 that adds the two exr*.cpp files to the embedded list. 
>>>  Then it should find your plugin just fine (although it's not a "stock" 
>>> libOpenImageIO at that point).
>>> 
>>>     -- lg
>>> 
>>> 
>>> On Jun 17, 2013, at 3:17 PM, Jonathan Egstad wrote:
>>> 
>>>> Without getting into too much detail we've codec modifications to the 
>>>> OpenEXR format that (hopefully soon!) will get rolled in to the standard 
>>>> distribution.  Until then we do need a customized plugin that has small 
>>>> modifications to the codec enumerations and is linked against our OpenEXR 
>>>> build.
>>>> 
>>>> So it sounds like our near-term solution is to build oiio without embedded 
>>>> plugins.
>>>> 
>>>> However I do think it would be a worthwhile fix if it's trivial enough to 
>>>> do as it would make plugin management more flexible.
>>>> If you don't want to change the API you could trap for a token in the 
>>>> search path like '<builtins>:/tmp/oiio/plugins' that would determine where 
>>>> to insert the embedded paths.
>>>> 
>>>> -jonathan
>>>> 
>>>> On Jun 17, 2013, at 2:06 PM, Larry Gritz wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> The idea of the plugins was to extend the set of supported file formats 
>>>>> at runtime.  An example would be if an application that uses OIIO wanted 
>>>>> to support for GIF files (we don't, natively), they could write their own 
>>>>> gif.imageio.so (or .dll) to extend support, rather than create a 
>>>>> customized libOpenImageIO.  Another example would be if there was a truly 
>>>>> proprietary format (internal to one company, or one application), they 
>>>>> could easily extend OIIO to support it just by writing that one DLL/DSO 
>>>>> without cluttering the public distribution or without revealing to the 
>>>>> world the details of their proprietary format.
>>>>> 
>>>>> (Aside: In truth, although I always thought of the plugin mechanism as an 
>>>>> important feature in an image library, it's not clear to me whether 
>>>>> anyone at all uses the ability to extend format support at runtime.  I 
>>>>> started out with *all* formats supported via DSO/DLL's, even the ones 
>>>>> that come with OIIO.  It was user demand that led to format support being 
>>>>> embedded in the library rather than DSO's.  People overwhelmingly found 
>>>>> the build and distribution simpler with one library rather than a dozen 
>>>>> or more plugins.)
>>>>> 
>>>>> I admit that I never really considered the case of somebody who wanted to 
>>>>> *replace* an existing format module, rather than extend the set of file 
>>>>> formats.  So it's not surprising that the library always considers the 
>>>>> built-in (embedded) implementations first, and only checks the DSO/DLL's 
>>>>> if none of the embedded readers are able to open the file.
>>>>> 
>>>>> If it's important to you, I think we could fix this pretty easily.  I'm 
>>>>> not sure I'd want it to be the default, but we could certainly make it an 
>>>>> option to check for DSOs first, i.e., reverse the priority.
>>>>> 
>>>>> Out of curiosity, what does your OpenEXR reader do that the standard one 
>>>>> does not?  Is a more productive route to propose an improvement to the 
>>>>> built-in exr reader?
>>>>> 
>>>>>   -- lg
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Jun 17, 2013, at 12:54 PM, Jonathan Egstad wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>>> Sorry if this has been answered before, I can't find a relevant mail.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> We've built oiio with embedded plugins and now we're attempting to 
>>>>>> override the exr plugin with a customized one.
>>>>>> Unfortunately the plugin_searchpath string passed to 
>>>>>> ImpageInput::create() does not appear to take precedence during the 
>>>>>> cataloging of available plugins which means the embedded openexr plugin 
>>>>>> appears to always be found first.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Is this the expected behavior or am I doing something wrong?
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The custom exr plugin is handicapped so the plugin's open() method will 
>>>>>> produce an assert error, but no assert is occurring so I'm assuming the 
>>>>>> embedded openexr plugin is getting called instead.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> From my reading of imageioplugin.cpp the catalog_all_plugins() method 
>>>>>> first calls catalog_builtin_plugins() before the searchpath string is 
>>>>>> being parsed (I haven't yet built oiio with debug prints to see what's 
>>>>>> going on in there, but that was going to be my next step.)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Thanks for any help,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> -jonathan
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> #include <OpenImageIO/imageio.h>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> using namespace OIIO_NAMESPACE;
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> const char* plugin_searchpath = "/tmp/oiio/plugins";
>>>>>> const char* read_path = "/tmp/oiio/plugins/test.exr";
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> int main(int argc, char* argv[]) {
>>>>>> ImageSpec spec;
>>>>>> ImageInput* reader = ImageInput::create(read_path, plugin_searchpath);
>>>>>> if (!reader) return 1;
>>>>>> if (!reader->open(read_path, spec)) {
>>>>>> std::cerr << "Unable to open file '" << read_path << "'" << std::endl;
>>>>>> return 1;
>>>>>> }
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> std::cout << spec.width << "x" << spec.height << std::endl;
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> return 0;
>>>>>> }
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Oiio-dev mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org
>>>>> 
>>>>> --
>>>>> Larry Gritz
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Oiio-dev mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Oiio-dev mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Larry Gritz
>>> [email protected]
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Oiio-dev mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Oiio-dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org
> 
> --
> Larry Gritz
> [email protected]
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Oiio-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org

--
Larry Gritz
[email protected]


_______________________________________________
Oiio-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org

Reply via email to