Søren, do you guys work from master, or do you need a backport?

> On Jun 27, 2016, at 10:43 AM, Søren Ragsdale <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> Sorry for the delay in responding.
> 
> 
> 
> I've read through the diffs. If I understand correctly, I should be able to:
> 
> - ask for "total_files" and get the total number of textures that OIIO knows 
> about
> 
> - ask for "all_filenames" and get back a list of all the textures that OIIO 
> knows about
> 
> - run a query on each of those files and get back bytesread, redundant_tiles, 
> and other things that OIIO knows about each texture.
> 
> 
> 
> That seems pretty useful, and seems sufficient for my purposes. Thanks!
> 
> 
> 
> On 18 Jun 2016 8:39 p.m., "Larry Gritz" <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> How does this look, Soren?  https://github.com/OpenImageIO/oiio/pull/1438 
> <https://github.com/OpenImageIO/oiio/pull/1438>
> 
> Look at the last part of the diff, the part of testtex that exercises it. 
> Look reasonable? I think this will let you extract the information you need 
> and pack it into whatever statistics format you prefer.
> 
> 
>> On Jun 16, 2016, at 11:54 AM, Larry Gritz <[email protected] 
>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>> 
>> Yes, it would also require a global TextureSystem::getattribute query that 
>> returns the list of all files accessed. That would be true regardless of 
>> whether the per-file stats are accessed via get_texture_info, or if you had 
>> direct access to the internals of the ImageCacheFile struct -- either way, 
>> you sill need the list of files. Giving access to the deep internals of the 
>> data structure necessary to construct that list yourself seems well into 
>> "TMI" territory. No good can come from making those internals part of the 
>> public API and losing the freedom to change them at will.
>> 
>> Let me mock something up and make a preliminary PR, and see if it looks like 
>> the right direction, and then if so, I can make it more complete.
>> 
>>      -- lg
>> 
>> 
>>> On Jun 16, 2016, at 2:04 AM, Søren Ragsdale <[email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>> 
>>> I'm not sure that's a good solution in this case. I don't want to ask about 
>>> any particular texture - I'd like to get a list of all the textures that 
>>> OIIO knows about, at which point I guess I could query the statistics for 
>>> each one of them.
>>> 
>>> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 12:59 AM, Larry Gritz <[email protected] 
>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>> I'm uncomfortable exposing the internals of the file record struct from the 
>>> ImageCache.
>>> 
>>> But I can offer a cleaner solution:
>>> 
>>> Just like you can retrieve various TextureSystem-wide statistics via 
>>> TS::getattribute("stats:foo", ...), perhaps I can add an API function that 
>>> lets you ask for statistics associated with a particular file. In fact, we 
>>> should probably simply use the existing get_texture_info(), and I can make 
>>> it aware of tags that retrieve the statistics. Then you can retrieve those 
>>> in a way that's not dependent on the internals which may change, and 
>>> assemble them into the XML or any other format you want.
>>> 
>>> Does that sound reasonable?
>>> 
>>> 
>>> > On Jun 15, 2016, at 3:05 AM, Søren Ragsdale <[email protected] 
>>> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > OIIO provides a OSL::TextureSystem.getstats() call, which is useful if 
>>> > you'd like to see OIIO stats represented as one large string.
>>> >
>>> > We're using OIIO inside OSL inside Prman-20. I'd like to stuff OIIO's 
>>> > texture access stats into Prman's XML-formatted logfile. But in order to 
>>> > do this, we need to have access to m_files which is a private member.
>>> >
>>> > Could we get some kind of const access function for m_files?
>>> >
>>> 
>>> --
>>> Larry Gritz
>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Oiio-dev mailing list
>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org 
>>> <http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org>
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Oiio-dev mailing list
>>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>> http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org 
>>> <http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org>
>> 
>> --
>> Larry Gritz
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Oiio-dev mailing list
>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>> http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org 
>> <http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org>
> 
> --
> Larry Gritz
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Oiio-dev mailing list
> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org 
> <http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org>
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Oiio-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org

--
Larry Gritz
[email protected]


_______________________________________________
Oiio-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org

Reply via email to