Wowee, that was meant for another thread! Not related to packed DPX!

> On Dec 4, 2021, at 1:44 PM, Larry Gritz <l...@larrygritz.com> wrote:
> 
> The other alternative, I suppose, is to have no limits by default, and apps 
> that wish to be "safe" need to proactively make a call to set up the 
> guardrails. But then you have to trust the majority of apps to set it, and to 
> do so sensibly (or risk not having any input sensibility validation in 
> place), rather than trusting just the very few who need higher limits to know 
> how to raise the controls.
> 
> Things like this are of growing concern to all our popular open source 
> libraries (not just OIIO), especially the ones successful enough to make 
> their way into commercial apps, cloud services, etc. -- those vendors become 
> paranoid (and rightfully so) that the library becomes an attack surface that 
> makes the whole app or service vulnerable to maliciously crafted input. The 
> few people who are out there looking for and exploiting every possible way to 
> subvert the software stack are really making life complicated and miserable 
> for the rest of us. This is why we can't have nice things.

--
Larry Gritz
l...@larrygritz.com




_______________________________________________
Oiio-dev mailing list
Oiio-dev@lists.openimageio.org
http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org

Reply via email to