Absolutely, would love to get any M1 fixes. The second one you mention (on DoNotOptimize) rings a bell. I think I may have fixed that one very recently, as the new Intel compiler gave the same error. So you may find that it's already fixed, at least in the current master.
> On Mar 13, 2022, at 1:13 AM, Mikael Sundell <mikael.sund...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hey, > > I've got a build running for my Mac M1/ arm64, two things I had to patch. > Just want to double check here before I propose a PR as I've been away from > everyday C++ coding for a while :-) > > First, uname -m on the Mac will not return aarch64, it simply return arm64. > Therefore I change the platformdetection (detectplatform.mk > <http://detectplatform.mk/>) to: > > ifneq (${hw},x86) > ifneq (${hw},x86_64) > ifneq (${hw},i386) > ifneq (${hw},i686) > ifneq (${hw},aarch64) > ifneq (${hw},arm64) > $(error "ERROR: Unknown hardware architecture") > endif > endif > endif > endif > endif > endif > > Second, for some reason the compiler attributes for inlining/ optimisation > seems to collide: > > In file included from > /Volumes/Build/3rdparty/build/macosx/arm64.debug/src/oiio/oiio/src/libutil/spinlock_test.cpp:10: > /Volumes/Build/3rdparty/build/macosx/arm64.debug/src/oiio/oiio/src/include/OpenImageIO/benchmark.h:29:1: > error: 'always_inline' attribute ignored [-Werror,-Wignored-attributes] > OIIO_FORCEINLINE T const& DoNotOptimize (T const &val); > ^ > /Volumes/Build/3rdparty/build/macosx/arm64.debug/src/oiio/oiio/src/include/OpenImageIO/platform.h:391:52: > note: expanded from macro 'OIIO_FORCEINLINE' > # define OIIO_FORCEINLINE inline __attribute__((always_inline)) > ^ > /Volumes/Build/3rdparty/build/macosx/arm64.debug/src/oiio/oiio/src/include/OpenImageIO/benchmark.h:431:33: > note: conflicting attribute is here > inline T const & __attribute__((__optnone__)) > ^ > 1 error generated. > > This can easily be resolved by just taking out the: > > #elif __has_attribute(__optnone__) > > section in benchmark.h: line 426. > > This is one where I don't feel confident, is that the right thing to do. I > don't know enough here to propose this as a change. > > I'm a bit rusty with all this, my comments here should probably be in the PR > itself. > > Anyway here it is, I've got a working arm64 build and happy to contribute. > > Mikael > _______________________________________________ > Oiio-dev mailing list > Oiio-dev@lists.openimageio.org > http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org -- Larry Gritz l...@larrygritz.com
_______________________________________________ Oiio-dev mailing list Oiio-dev@lists.openimageio.org http://lists.openimageio.org/listinfo.cgi/oiio-dev-openimageio.org