Erg, just tagged, umh. We should have all fixes for a release in before
we vote on that release, I think.
-Brian
On Apr 2, 2005, at 12:02 PM, Armin Waibel wrote:
Hi Brian,
when will you start with the 1.0.3 release build?
I have one open issue (handling DCollection add/remove action).
Currently I'm working on that stuff and I wish to fix it today.
regards,
Armin
Martin Kal�n wrote:
Armin Waibel wrote:
call me crazy, but I suggest to make a OJB 1.0.3 bug fix release as
soon as possible.
Critical bug = release as fast as possible IMO.
I don't think we should call it 1.0.2sp1 or just replace the
binary 1.0.2 that was actually downloadable for a while (the last
one is a _horrible_ support-scenario). For me a service-pack,
patch-set, hotfix or similar is a small binary package you drop
"next to" the relase and not a full release-drop.
My suggestion is 1.0.2a or 1.0.3 with clear release notes
("this is a bug fix release"?). Since OJB has no history of lettered
versioning, 1.0.3 seems more consistent.
Some other thoughts summarizing my view on recent release discussions
(given as hypothetical voting standpoints):
+1 for normal release-cycle on a, say, monthly basis
(I'm not picky with the exact cycle, 3-6 weeks is OK IMO.)
-1 for pushing site only on release (let's push it more often!)
-0 for holding off release beacuse of tutorial or site-changes
+1 for scheduled code-freeze or vote on binaries
Regards,
Martin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
