OJB should respect Set/List as the field type for collection descriptors that
do not specify a collection class
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: OJB-19
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OJB-19
Project: OJB
Type: Bug
Components: PB-API
Versions: 1.0.3
Reporter: Thomas Dudziak
Assigned to: Thomas Dudziak
Fix For: 1.0.4
In cases where the collection-descriptor of a field of type List/Set does not
specify collection-class, OJB currently uses RemovalAwareCollection which is a
List but not a Set.
Instead, OJB should use the field type, and either throw a metadata exception
if none of the default collection classes can be assigned to it, or use a
fitting default collection.
This also means that a RemovalAwareSet is needed (based upon ManageableHashSet).
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
If you want more information on JIRA, or have a bug to report see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
