[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OJB-67?page=all ]
Thomas Dudziak updated OJB-67:
------------------------------
Fix Version: 1.0.x CVS
1.1 CVS
> Add a new check to the xdoclet module to avoid weird mapping errors of
> one-to-many relationships
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OJB-67
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OJB-67
> Project: OJB
> Type: Improvement
> Versions: 1.1 CVS, 1.0.3
> Environment: OJB 1.0.3
> Reporter: Guillaume Laforge
> Assignee: Thomas Dudziak
> Fix For: 1.0.x CVS, 1.1 CVS
>
> I had a weird transaction problem, where I couldn't manage to store a
> one-to-many relationship within a transaction.
> This was quite misleading, because in fact, that was just a mapping problem.
> I mistakenly used both foreignkey and remote-foreignkey pointing at the same
> column, though the remote-foreignkey wasn't needed since that was a
> one-to-many relationship and not a many-to-many relationship.
> So the idea would be to add a sanity check to verify that you can't have both
> foreignkey and remote-foreignkey attributes pointing at the same column.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]