[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OJB-105?page=all ]
     
Martin Kalén closed OJB-105:
----------------------------


New implementation + documentation completed. TODO about repository consistence 
validation check for null-check definitions across foreign key references 
should be opened as a new issue if considered worth implementing.

> Pluggable "null" definition for persistent fields
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>          Key: OJB-105
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OJB-105
>      Project: OJB
>         Type: New Feature

>   Components: PB-API
>     Versions: 1.0.4
>     Reporter: Martin Kalén
>     Assignee: Martin Kalén
>     Priority: Minor
>      Fix For: 1.0.5

>
> OJB 1.0.4 has an unflexible way of checking for "null" values, in particular 
> in primary-/foreign-key fields, that is located in BrokerHelper. For certain 
> use-cases it must be possible to plug in your own definition of "null", 
> preferrably through the repository XML-mapping on the "field-descriptor" node.
> Example: a table has a single numeric column as primary key, the column is 
> mapped to a "long" field in Java which is represented internally in OJB as 
> java.lang.Long. Currently one cannot insert or delte a row in this table 
> where the primary key is 0, since OJB will throw an exception declaring that 
> all primary key fields must be non-null.
> With the possibility to plug in / change to a more relaxed "null" definition 
> on this particular PK field, it's possible to work with 0 values for the PK 
> in this table.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to