[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OJB-119?page=comments#action_12428276 ] Armin Waibel commented on OJB-119: ----------------------------------
Hi Mike, > This page clearly states that the default JDBC level is "1.0" whereas the > 1.0.4 codebase shows "2.0" as the > default. In class ClassDescriptor jdbc-level "2.0" is used by default. In repository.dtd level "1.0" is used by default and documentation states "1.0". This isn't well-defined ;-) Think jdbc-level "2.0" is useful as default , because most DB support "2.0" - will fix this. > It looks like they are old attributes used pre-datasource (protocol, > subprotocol, dbalias, etc). These attributes are further on used by OJB (except when a Datasource is used), e.g. http://db.apache.org/ojb/repository_database.xml.txt By the way for OJB 2.x we plan to rework the metadata classes. > JDBC connection documentation out of date > ----------------------------------------- > > Key: OJB-119 > URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OJB-119 > Project: OJB > Issue Type: Bug > Affects Versions: 1.0.4 > Reporter: Mike Perham > Priority: Minor > > This page clearly states that the default JDBC level is "1.0" whereas the > 1.0.4 codebase shows "2.0" as the default. > http://db.apache.org/ojb/docu/guides/repository.html#Attributes-N10127 > There are also a number of attributes which are handled in > ConnectionDescriptorXmlHandler.java which are not documented at all. I don't > know if this is because they are old cruft or new undocumented features. It > looks like they are old attributes used pre-datasource (protocol, > subprotocol, dbalias, etc). -- This message is automatically generated by JIRA. - If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa - For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
