Nope, it is required to be the same as the real name of the java field, otherwise OJB wouldn't find the field. So in short, you cannot specify a different name (as this would refer to a different field). You can however add anonymous fields (put a field tag in the class javadoc comment with a name attribute).
I realise it has to match up on the Java/OJB side, but the table column name can be anything, as in:
<field-descriptor
name="someProperty"
column="THE_COLUMN"
jdbc-type="INTEGER"
nullable="true"
access="anonymous"
/>Basically, I'd like the 'name' property from ojb.field to control the value of 'column'. Does that make sense?
L.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
