Gelhar, Wallace Joseph wrote:
Good to hear!Hi Tom,
This was a little misleading for me, since I did *not* want to generate fields (or table information) for my persistent base class, but did want the fields to be included in each concrete class definition.
So the way I ended up mapping was to eliminate the @ojb.class markup in the persistent base class and interface, but leave the @ojb.field markup on the getters only in the interface.
Markup each Interface with @ojb.class generate-table-info="false" and markup each getter in the interface. This produces an extent definition for the implementing class.
So in short, I have it producing exactly what I need now.
I see whether I can enhance the description of the generate-table-info attribute a bit to make its intention and use clearer.
Tom
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
