Gelhar, Wallace Joseph wrote:

Hi Tom,

This was a little misleading for me, since I did *not* want to generate
fields (or table information) for my persistent base class, but did want
the fields to be included in each concrete class definition.

So the way I ended up mapping was to eliminate the @ojb.class markup in
the persistent base class and interface, but leave the @ojb.field markup
on the getters only in the interface.

Markup each Interface with @ojb.class generate-table-info="false" and
markup each getter in the interface.  This produces an extent definition
for the implementing class.

So in short, I have it producing exactly what I need now.


Good to hear!
I see whether I can enhance the description of the generate-table-info attribute a bit to make its intention and use clearer.


Tom


--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to