Hi Daniel.
thanks for your response :)
Hi All
I use OJB for my Webapp Application ( Webapp1 + Tomcat + OJB+ Oracle) ,
is very grood performance BUT
I haver other Webapp 2 do not use the OJB but use same Tomcat and Oracle
(Webapp2 + Tomcat + Oracle )
Thats ok, but be very careful with sequence managers - i know most of them
are NOT happy with other apps doing inserts! see:
http://db.apache.org/ojb/docu/guides/sequencemanager.html
yes I have not Other solution I can not convert Webapp 2 to use same Ojb
cache or OJB.
My Problem
when Webapp 2 (Update or Insert) in the Data Base the result is no 't
visible for the Webapp 1
what is best using for performance
all table is refresh="true"
or
broker.removeCache() before (insert or update Webapp 2)
That depends on how often will app2 be updating/inserting data?
If app2 only does it every few hours, i would put some code in for app2 to
make a request to app1 to do a broker.clearCache() Note that app2 cant call
broker.clearCache() directly as that would be an instance of OJB under app2,
not app1.
the application only does few hours to update/insert the base
However if app2 is going to be inserting/updating data fairly often then
you'd probably be better eliminating the cache. Either use refresh=true on
class-descriptors, or more simply just switch to ObjectCachePerBrokerImpl
cache implementation (probably a better solution).
Daniel.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
*Reda BENZAIR**
*Software Analyst
**SmartJog S.A*
*Phone: +33 (0)1 4996 6324
Fax: +33 (0)1 4996 6323
[EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
