Hi, Thomas. New to OBJ, I'm trying to decide whether to use it within my project as persistence layer or not. I have concerns since I read on http://db.apache.org/ojb/features.html that OQL support is incomplete, also there are some flaws in transaction handling.
Now the bad question: Do you estimate the JDO api of OBJ is stable enough to build a project onto that? Where could be pitfalls? Or do you suggest to use the ODMG or even the PersistenceBroker APIs? Hiran ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mahler Thomas" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'OJB Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, February 19, 2003 5:32 PM Subject: AW: JDO > Hi Lennart, > > By using SUNs JDORI and the OJB OjbStore Plugin (See tutorial4.html for > details) you have a fully compliant JDO solution today! > > We want to have a full replacement of the upper JDORI layers for OJB 2.0. > This implementation will add no functionality but only have non-functional > improvements (performance, resource consumption). > There is no time schedule for this release yet. > > cheers, > Thomas > > > -----Urspr�ngliche Nachricht----- > > Von: Lennart Benoot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 19. Februar 2003 14:44 > > An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Betreff: JDO > > > > > > Hey All, > > > > Is there a date set forward when OJB will fully support JDO? > > > > Regards, > > Lennart > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
