Hi Christian, Bill

I currently add a new test case to demonstrate
the described behaviour.
Could you check if I hit the bull's eye.
See ReferenceTest#testRepositoryFKStore

regards,
Armin

----- Original Message -----
From: "Malinescu, Cristian" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'OJB Users List'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 12, 2003 6:15 PM
Subject: RE: Interesting (failing) scenario of FKs/PKs in PB


Hi
Yes, I succeeded to this behaviour but only for Oracle, for MySQL was
going
OK,
and for my typical situation I needed only one PK, no FK.
This was strange for me, and I posted one email on this theme last week,
but
till
now no remark/comment. I'm using the PB basic API.
regards,
Cristian

-----Original Message-----
From: V.B. Skrypnyk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Mittwoch, 12. M�rz 2003 18:02
To: OJB Users List
Subject: Re: Interesting (failing) scenario of FKs/PKs in PB


Has anyone else encountered this problem?

--Bill.

> Hi,
>
> The following fails to be stored by PersistenceBroker:
>
> I have a class ACL which has two primary keys: objectId and userFK,
and
> userFK is also a foreign key tied to a reference of type User. If I do
this:
>
> persistentBroker.beginTransaction();
> ACL acl = new ACL();
> acl.setObjectId( 100 );
> acl.setUser( currentUser );
> persistentBroker.store(acl);
> persistentBroker.commitTransaction();
>
> Acl will not be saved. The reason seems to be because in the
storeToDb()
> method of the PersistentBroker, there first comes an assertion of the
> PrimaryKeys and afterwards comes the assignment of all the foreign
keys.
In
> the scenario above the assertion of the primary keys will fail,
because
the
> userFK has not been assigned yet, so we have an incomplete set of
primary
> keys. This does work with the ODMG layer, probably because of a
different
> sequence of events during the storing of the object.
>
> I wonder if there should be a check whether a primary key is shared by
the
> foreign key and allow that assignment before the assertion of the
primary
> keys is performed. Any ideas?
>
> Cheers,
> --Bill.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]





---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to