I use both the PB and ODMG in the same accessor class. I use PB to do all the read only processing and then ODMG when I will be updating or adding to the database. I've only done a small bit of testing using this methodology however. cheers, gary
-----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, April 03, 2003 12:44 PM To: OJB Users List Subject: Re: ODMG vs. PB It's beacuse ODMG is a full fledged Object transaction manager. It does a full tracking of object states during transactions etc. This causes all the overhead. The "real" persistence work is done with the underlying PB API and is not slower than native PB operations. cheers, Thomas Jacob Hookom wrote: > Looking at the performance benchmarks at OJB's page, there's a dramatic > difference in speed between ODMG and PB implementations. Is this because of > the object locking features with ODMG, or is it because ODMG uses PB and > that extra adapter layer causes slow downs? > > -Jacob > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
