You wouldn't happen to be using MySQL? -----Original Message----- From: Mauricio CASTRO [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 4:06 PM To: OJB Users List Subject: Re: Non-decomposed m:n mappings with ODMG
I succesfuly use an m:n mapping and ODMG. "Until they become conscious they will never rebel, and until after they have rebelled they cannot become conscious" --Orwell 1984 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Eric Northam" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, June 10, 2003 3:07 PM Subject: Non-decomposed m:n mappings with ODMG > Has anyone been able to store an object with an m:n mapping using the > ODMG api? It works fine with the persistence broker but doesn't work > with ODMG as > far as I can tell. Unfortunately I have several objects with a many to many > relationship so I'm wondering whether I should drop using the ODMG api > all together. Is there any consequence to using both ODMG and the > persistence broker together as a workaround? > > Eric > > > > > > DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail is, unless > otherwise indicated, confidential and is intended solely for the use > of the named addressee. Access, copying or re-use of the e-mail or any > information contained therein by any other person is not authorized. > If you are not the > intended recipient please notify us immediately by returning the > e-mail to the originator. > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] DISCLAIMER: The information contained in this e-mail is, unless otherwise indicated, confidential and is intended solely for the use of the named addressee. Access, copying or re-use of the e-mail or any information contained therein by any other person is not authorized. If you are not the intended recipient please notify us immediately by returning the e-mail to the originator.
