Hi Joerg, I made some tests but can not reproduce your problem. Maybe it's a synchronization problem of concurrent threads? A test case reproduce your problem will be helpful.
> to release the locks. No changes were made since calling checkpoint()---) I checked this in a test, but all works fine <snip> tx.begin(); // store some objects storeObjects(tx, getNewODMGZoos(3, name)); tx.checkpoint(); tx.commit(); </snip> regards, Armin ----- Original Message ----- From: "Joerg Lensing" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "OJB Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, June 23, 2003 5:20 PM Subject: Re: abort transaction causes TransactionNotInProgressException > Armin Waibel schrieb: > > >Hi Joerg, > > > >could you post more stack trace? > >OJB version? standalone? > > > >regards, > >Armin > > > > > hi armin, > ojb-version is rc3. Now I tried to use "commit()" instead of > "abort"(---should result in the same state because I use it > to release the locks. No changes were made since calling checkpoint()---) > . But sometimes > objectEnvelopeTable in "TransactionImpl.doAbort()" is null (-> > NullpointerException) > > > > java.lang.NullPointerException > at org.apache.ojb.odmg.TransactionImpl.doClose(TransactionImpl.java:398) > at org.apache.ojb.odmg.TransactionImpl.commit(TransactionImpl.java:568) > at de.softcon.webcontrol.integration.data.ojb.OjbDAOTransactionHandler.comm itTransaction(OjbDAOTransactionHandler.java:54) > > > > TransactionImpl.doAbort > > joerg > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
