(this is a real long mail, but I've made a long research. The first part is
the reason I started to research, the second is explain why this occur. The
third is a suggestion of how can we correct).

FIRST PART:
Ok. To avoid the problem related to OJB always using RemovalAwareCollection,
I put my beans to work as

public class A {
  private ArrayList myColl = new ArrayList();

  public void setMyCollection( List collection ) { this.myColl.clear;
this.myColl.addAll( collection ); }
  public List getMyCollection( ) {return this.myColl;}
}

Doing this, I'm converting from RemovalAwareCollection to ArrayList. Fine.

Now suppose that I want auto-delete="true". Then I

getMyCollection().remove(0);

and then persist the object. Theorically, OJB should delete the object from
indirection table AND the referenced table (the N side, ok?). This not
occur. OJB deletes only from indirection table (the auto-delete option makes
no difference).

If I change the code to

public class A {
  private List myColl;

  public void setMyCollection( List collection ) { this.myColl=collection; }
  public List getMyCollection( ) {return this.myColl;}
}

then it works (because the collection passed to setter is
RemovalAwareCollection). BUT, if I put auto-delete="false", then OJB still
delete the indirection table AND the referenced table (again, the
auto-delete option makes no difference).

SECOND PART:
To the facts: since OJB is using RemovalAwareCollection, after the correct
treatment for M:N non-decomposable queries (that my debugging show that it
is working like a charm), the following code is being executed:

                // invoke callback on collection
                if (col instanceof ManageableCollection)
                {
                    ((ManageableCollection) col).afterStore(this);
                }

That is deleting the real objects, even if auto-delete="false".

THIRD PART:
The method deleteMtoNImplementor(...) should reset the
"allObjectsToBeRemoved" in RemovalAwareCollection if the auto-delete option
is set to false. What do you think? Something like create a RemovalAware
interface. Make all classes (RemovalAwareCollection, and RemovalAwareList in
my case) implement it. Then do

public interface RemovalAware {

  public void resetDeleted();
}

The resetDelete method implementation is just

public void resetDeleted( ) {
  allObjectsToBeRemoved.clear();
}


and then change PersistentBrokerImpl to

                    currentMtoNKeys = getMtoNImplementor(cds, obj);
                    // delete unused m:n implementors
                    deleteMtoNImplementor(cds, obj, (Collection)col,
currentMtoNKeys);

                    if( col instanceof ManageableCollection &&
!cds.getCascadeDelete() ) {
                      Collection testCol;
                      if( col instanceof CollectionProxy ) {
                        testCol = ( ( CollectionProxy )col ).getData();
                      } else {
                        testCol = ( Collection )col;
                      }

                      if( testCol instanceof RemovalAware ) {
                        ( ( RemovalAware )testCol ).resetDeleted();
                      }
                    }

This make M:N suff work working. I'm using CVS HEAD.

Thanks for your patience.

Edson Richter




---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.493 / Virus Database: 292 - Release Date: 25/6/2003


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to