Hi David, sorry for overlook your post twice, such was not my intention. I think you are right - will fix this ASAP!
> 1) Shouldn't this be a set, for perfomance reasons. hmm, in that case I don't think List is an performance impact. > 2) Should this be based on Identity, rather than on the object (and it's > equals method) itself? I fully agree with that. regards, Armin ----- Original Message ----- From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 2:36 PM Subject: PersistenceBrokerImpl.delete() > I posted this (twice) to the DEV list, but never saw it come through.... > > PB keeps a list of objects that are marked for delete, and avoids deleting > them twice. > > 1) Shouldn't this be a set, for perfomance reasons. > 2) Should this be based on Identity, rather than on the object (and it's > equals method) itself? > > David > > > This message contains information from Equifax Inc. which may be > confidential and privileged. If you are not an intended recipient, please > refrain from any disclosure, copying, distribution or use of this > information and note that such actions are prohibited. If you have > received this transmission in error, please notify by e-mail > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
