Thanks for the suggestion. I built from the latest code in CVS last night, and still had the same problem.
-Rob -----Original Message----- From: Armin Waibel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, July 07, 2003 7:23 PM To: OJB Users List Subject: Re: Partial collection problem Hi Rob, I think this is an known issue, please try latest CVS. regards, Armin ----- Original Message ----- From: "Rob Kischuk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, July 07, 2003 3:31 PM Subject: RE: Partial collection problem > This is a big problem - we have a collection of 200 items that we are > retrieving, and the first query only retrieves a single item, with each > subsequent query retrieving one more item (e.g. - the fifth query result has > 5 items). > > This seems to be either a very nasty error on my part, or a major bug. Can > anyone shed some additional light on this? Is it a bug? Is there a > workaround? This is a major showstopper for OJB on an application we're > working on, and could require some major rework. > > -Rob > > -----Original Message----- > From: Rob Kischuk > Sent: Thursday, July 03, 2003 9:43 AM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: Partial collection problem > > I saw a discussion cross this list a while back regarding this same problem, > but with no solution. The problem is this: when I run a query to load a > collection of objects that contain other objects, the first call retrieves > only the first item in the collection. The second call retrieves a total of > 2 items, the third, a total of 3 items, and so on. Obviously, the correct > functionality would be to have all of the items in the collection retrieved > on the first call. > > > > I described the issue in great detail as a part of Defect OJB172: > http://scarab.werken.com/issues/curmodule/120/tqk/0/template/ViewIssue.v m/id > /OJB172/issuelist/-1/issuelist/1/issuelist/OJB172 > <http://scarab.werken.com/issues/curmodule/120/tqk/0/template/ViewIssue. vm/i > d/OJB172/issuelist/-1/issuelist/1/issuelist/OJB172> > > > > But it appears that the defect hasn't been touched since I entered it. Is > there a known fix or workaround for it? > > > > Thanks! > > Rob > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
