Hello, I have a question concerning advanced O/R-mapping. Suppose you have three class A, B, C. Suppose that both A and B have a collection of C. Suppose furthermore that every C instance is in exactly one of these collections.
When I map this to a relational database, I might want to have four tables A, B, CA, CB, such that CA contains those C instances that are associated to an A instances (and analogously for B instead of A). This way, the table in which a particular C instance is stored, is determined at runtime. OJB cannot do that, I think. But is it an esoteric idea? I have that situation in my application and I am a bit disappointed that I have to split class C just because I map it to a database. Olli --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
