Hi, ----- Original Message ----- From: "Farnea Massimiliano" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "OJB Users List" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2003 10:27 AM Subject: R: Questions: High/Low Sequence Manager
> > 2. The sequence-name for my implementations are diffent, one is > referenced > > only in the repository.xml, while I got direct access to the second in > my > > application code. > Sorry, I don't understand that. > Can you explain more. > > I use a Sequence Manager (SequenceManagerHighLowImpl) normally for > autoincrementing some entity fields (the primary keys), I configured it in > the repository.xml; > while I use a different Sequence Manager (a SequenceManagerHighLowImpl > extension) inside my business logic classes. > My question finally is: are there any known troubles using 2 > SequenceManagerHighLowImpl istances (with different sequence name) on the > same database? > No, this shouldn't cause any troubles. OJB itself use different instances of the same SM implementation - each PB instance use its own SM instance. So if your extension does not corrupt data in the OJB_HL_SEQ table, all should work fine. (I recommend you to write a junit test to do some "real life" tests) regards, Armin > Thanks, > > Massimiliano Farnea > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
