Hi again:

> 
> Hi Archie,
> 
> > 
> > Hi,
> >   Yes, I agree your statement. I like OJB, but
> > sometimes I feel OJB does not continue enhanceing its 
> > mapping capability.

here is another mapping feature that has been added recently:
Using Stored procedures for basic persistence operations:
http://db.apache.org/ojb/how-to-work-with-stored-procedures.html
 


> Just after the anonymous field feature we introduced a 
> feature for mapping
> inheritance hierarchies on multiple joined tables:
> http://db.apache.org/ojb/tutorial3.html#mapping%20classes%20on
> %20multiple%20
> joined%20tables
>  
> > Hibernate does have better mapping
> > capability. 
> 
> Mhh. I've checked the Hibernate Mapping documentation and did not see
> anything that is not possible with OJB.
> What exactly is missing?
> 
> We are happy to implement new features if users are requesting them.  
> I think that Hibernate is very good at providing a feature 
> set that covers
> many real world problems out of the box.
> The OJB mindset is a bit different. It goes like "We provide 
> you with a
> flexible infrastructure that will allow you to build you 
> persistence layer
> of choice".
> 
> Maybe OJB should provide more out of the box solutions for 
> typical mapping
> problems?
> Please let us know what exactly you would like to see!
> 
> thanks for your input,
> thomas
> 
> > Since the introduction of "anonymous
> > field" into OJB which I quite like it, OJB does not
> > improve mapping capability much. Maybe too much effort
> > is taken on JDO implementation. But since JDO 1.0
> > itself does not regulate much about OR mapping (it is
> > heard that in 2.0, much regulatin will be made), good
> > OR mapping mechanism should be borrowed from some
> > other good ideas like Hibernate.
> > 
> >   By the way, I like the embedded (nested) field
> > function in OJB. Hibernate has similar function called
> > component, but for deeper nesting its configuration is
> > not that easy.
> > 
> > Archie
> > 
> > --- Rice Yeh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > 
> > > > Hi,
> > > >   I have been using OJB for some period. I am
> > > taking
> > > > a
> > > > project left by a partner that uses Hinbernate for
> > > > persistence. So I start studying Hibernate.
> > > > Hibernate
> > > > has a mapping function called "any type mapping"
> > > > that
> > > > is defined as the follows:
> > > > 
> > > > "The <any> mapping element defines a polymorphic
> > > > association to classes from multiple tables. This
> > > > type
> > > > of mapping always requires more than one column.
> > > The
> > > > first column holds the type of the associated
> > > > entity.
> > > > The remaining columns hold the identifier. It is
> > > > impossible to specify a foreign key constraint for
> > > > this kind of association, so this is most
> > > certainly
> > > > not meant as the usual way of mapping
> > > (polymorphic)
> > > > associations."
> > > > 
> > > > This kind of mapping is quite useful when dealing
> > > > with
> > > > fields of java.lang.Object or interface. However,
> > > as
> > > > I
> > > > know, there is no such support in OJB. I try to
> > > > study
> > > > the source code of OJB, but am still not able to
> > > > figure out the way to modify it (The xml mapping
> > > > handling code is a little hard to understand, just
> > > > wonder if it is possible to re-write it with Jibx
> > > to
> > > > make it more concise). 
> > > > 
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Rice
> > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > __________________________________
> > > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > > Exclusive Video Premiere - Britney Spears
> > > > http://launch.yahoo.com/promos/britneyspears/
> > > > 
> > > >
> > >
> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > For additional commands, e-mail:
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > __________________________________
> > > Do you Yahoo!?
> > > Exclusive Video Premiere - Britney Spears
> > > http://launch.yahoo.com/promos/britneyspears/
> > 
> > 
> > __________________________________
> > Do you Yahoo!?
> > Exclusive Video Premiere - Britney Spears
> > http://launch.yahoo.com/promos/britneyspears/
> > 
> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to