Yes! FieldConversions are a very old feature.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, November 17, 2003 10:37 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: Problem persisting dates
> 
> 
> Hello,
> 
> Is the "conversion=" mechanism works with OJB 0.9.5?
> 
> Thanks
> Sylvain
> 
> > -----Message d'origine-----
> > De: Gelhar, Wallace Joseph [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Date: vendredi, 14. novembre 2003 18:05
> > �: OJB Users List
> > Objet: RE: Problem persisting dates
> > 
> > 
> > Hi Carl,
> > 
> > java.sql.Date represents a date only, not a date/time.  The database
> > should be a datetime field, the JDBC type should be 
> TIMESTAMP and you
> > must use a conversion field to convert to java.util.Date.
> > 
> > This is an extract from one of my repository.xml files.
> > 
> > <field-descriptor
> >     name="updated"
> >     column="Updated"
> >     jdbc-type="TIMESTAMP"
> >  
> > conversion="org.apache.ojb.broker.accesslayer.conversions.Java
> > Date2SqlTi
> > mestampFieldConversion"
> >   />
> > 
> > Wally
> > 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Boyes, Carl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > Sent: Friday, November 14, 2003 11:01 AM
> > To: OJB Users List (E-mail)
> > Subject: Problem persisting dates
> > 
> > 
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > I have an object that has a java.util.Date attribute.  When 
> persisting
> > this date, the time portion is stripped. Although dates 
> with times are
> > successfully retrieved from the database.
> > 
> > I've tried using
> > org.apache.ojb.broker.accesslayer.conversions.JavaDate2SqlDate
> > FieldConve
> > rsio
> > n without success.
> > 
> > I've also tried modifying the jdbc-type in the sql repository to
> > TIMESTAMP and using
> > org.apache.ojb.broker.accesslayer.conversions.JavaDate2SqlTime
> > stampField
> > Conv
> > ersion, but this made no difference.
> > 
> > I'm using MS SQLServer, the current attribute mapping is:
> > 
> >     <field-descriptor name="actionDueDate" column="ActionDueDate"
> > jdbc-type="DATE"
> >     
> > conversion="org.apache.ojb.broker.accesslayer.conversions.Java
> > Date2SqlDa
> > teFi
> > eldConversion" />
> > 
> > I've looked through the archives and have not found a solution to my
> > problem, I'm sure I'm missing something obvious!
> > 
> > Regards,
> > 
> > Carl.
> > 
> > The contents of this email are confidential to the intended 
> > recipient at
> > the email address to which it has been addressed.  It may not be
> > disclosed to or used by anyone other than this addressee, nor 
> > may it be
> > copied in any way. If received in error, please contact 
> DLA, a UK law
> > firm, (http://www.dla.com/) on +44 (0) 8700 111111 quoting 
> the name of
> > the sender and the addressee and then delete it from your system.
> >  
> > Please note that neither DLA nor the sender accepts any 
> responsibility
> > for viruses and it is your responsibility to scan the email and
> > attachments (if any).  No contracts may be concluded on 
> > behalf of DLA by
> > means of email communications.
> > 
> > A list of the names of the partners of DLA (who are either 
> > solicitors or
> > registered foreign lawyers) and their qualifications is 
> available for
> > inspection at 3 Noble Street, London, EC2V 7EE, UK.
> > 
> > Regulated by the Law Society.
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > 
> > 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 
> > 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to