Hi Thomas, Thanks for your help. I thought about this solution, but honestly, it is not very beautiful. They are no other ways ? Is it possible to hope that OJB will do this easily in a future release ?
Thanks, Regards Eric -----Message d'origine----- De : Thomas Dudziak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoye : vendredi 21 novembre 2003 18:15 A : OJB Users List Objet : RE: Collection of string On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, eric barbe wrote: > Hi, > > Yes, I need to use this table on reporting applications that do not use OJB. > This fields must be readable. > The string class itself won't work as an existing string object cannot be changed anymore (upon loading OJB creates the object using the no-argument constructor and the sets the fields). So I suggest that you use a wrapper class in your collection such as: class Value { private Integer id; private String value; ... public Value() {} public void setValue(String value) { this.value = value; } public String getValue() { return value; } ... } (You don't really need the id here, an anonymous primarykey field would also work). Then you simply define a class descriptor for this class in your repository descriptor. Tom --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
