Thomas Dudziak dijo: > On Fri, 19 Dec 2003, Antonio Gallardo wrote: > >> Thomas Dudziak dijo: >> > Ah I see. Well, in the XDoclet module at least I could ensure that the >> > foreignkeys/inverse-foreignkeys are in the same order as the >> primarykeys. >> >> Hmm. I understand, we can have in a automatic tool a "sort" function >> that >> would allow us a predefined order. But as was pointed before we cannot >> rely on the position of the keys. It is not AFAIK OO or Relational at >> all. >> >> I think we need to fix it in OJB. > > I guess so. Since OJB can derive the correct ordering from the target > class descriptor, the same sorting could be added to OJB. Also, this > probably can be done at startup avoiding additional costs when accessing > the collection/reference.
To be honest I don't saw it in the way you described above. But it looks like a great idea! It would solve the problem at all. :-D Best Regards, Antonio Gallardo --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
