Hello,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Thomas Mahler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> yes, that's possible!
> You can execute an OQL query without using ODMG transactions at all!
> (internally we are using an implicit transaction to make this
> possible).
> Simply perform the query and work with the returned Objects
> and store them with the PB. No problem.
> > Is it possible to use OQL with the PB API (no other odmg calls other
> > than OQL Queries) ?
I might be wrong, but I think that OQL returns ODMG collections
(DList or the like) as return types, and for some reason that
requires to have the corresponding internal tables in the database
schema.
I remember that once I ran into that problem, but that
is long time ago.
My point is that he who uses the PB API might prefer
to get along without any OJB internal tables in the DB,
and (if I am right) that is not possible together with ODMG
queries.
Olli
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
