OK, so we'll wait a bit longer... cheers, Thomas
> -----Original Message----- > From: Thomas Dudziak [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, January 19, 2004 10:55 AM > To: OJB Users List > Subject: RE: New XDoclet OJB module version > > > On Mon, 19 Jan 2004, Mahler Thomas wrote: > > > Hi Tom, > > > > Wow, what a large cvs commit! This must have been a lot of > work! Thanks for > > your hard work! > > That's only for show ;-) > I had to delay CVS checkin until now because I didn't want to break > things, but now all unit tests run ... > > > Do you think it's reasonable to bring out 1.0 next weekend > including your > > updated version? > > Or should we wait a bit longer to check in any possible fixes? > > For the xdoclet ojb module this depends on three things: > > * How fast am I implementing the unit tests for nested object > support and > fix any found bugs > > * Are there (new) issues with the module > > * There are some minor functionalities that are yet missing > (option for > the torque task to control whether foreignkeys are generated, > support for > insert-procedure/update-procedure/delete-procedure) but > should be present > for the 1.0 final > > Tom > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
