When using the default cache implementation, i run out of memory when performing a great amount of object storings with ojb. I saw a post some weeks ago saying that someone ran into the same problem. An idea was that the cache keys were not garbaged, even if objects were (via SoftReference). I also saw that there was an implementation of a LRU cache that was begun (ObjectCacheSoftImpl). I added the right constructor to it, and used it. It seems to work great. So my question is: will this ObjectCacheSoftImpl class will be supported, or should i continue to use my own derived implementation ?
Guillaume Nodet --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
