On Thu, 5 Feb 2004, Gary wrote: > Yes, I thought of your option - but I'd have to write > a bunch of very similar code in each concrete > subclass...
Sounds like reuse through inheritance, but anyway ;-) > What do you see as the negatives of option 2? Nothing negative, I just wasn't able to make any changes yesterday, so I thought there might be another solution that helps you sooner. Anyway, I just checked a changed RowReaderDefaultImpl into CVS that creates an instance of the factory-class if the factory-method is not static. Tom --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
