> Oh yes the certainly can be a good idea. I'm not against this, but with 
> no current java mechanism for automatically enforcing this sort of 
> thing, effort/time must be expended to enforce it manually, and thus I 
> would only do it where it appears to be critical (such as an obvious way 
> that wrong types could hit the collection and an exception should be 
> thrown), or provide some form of optimization if that optimization is 
> needed. In this case, I will do it to make OJB's jdori plug-in happy. It 
> will be interesting to see if/how how JDO is effected by the 1.5 
> generics you describe. It sounds like the metadata would have to become 
> non-optional in some cases.

Or vice versa superfluous as already present in the java type (generics).
I'll also be very interested in seeing how Java 1.5 affects OJB ;-)

Tom


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to