Hello Florent, I understand this as a question about the typeB collection or the typeA collection exclusively in the C instance? Then you can't even model this in UML (or so I think), so I don't think you can in OJB. The only workaround I know without having two collections in C is a relation to the class Object (or another parent of A as well as parent of B), but actually I have huge problems with OJB in determining which is the real child class with a relation to the parent class. What is so bad about having two collections in C anyway? In the setter method you cold restrict on having only one collection filled. regards, Birgitta
- RE: Mapping question eric barbe
- RE: Mapping question Norbert . Woegerbauer
- RE: Mapping question eric barbe
- Help with 1n mapping (new to OJB) Pablo A. Osso
- Re: Help with 1n mapping (new to OJB) Jim Theodoridis
- RE: Mapping question Norbert . Woegerbauer
- Mapping Question Patrick Scheuerer
- Re: Mapping Question Patrick Scheuerer
- RE: Mapping Question Coup, Robert Muir
- Mapping question ftanare
- Re: Mapping question BIRGITTA . MOEHRING
- Re: Mapping question ftanare
- Re: Mapping question ftanare
- Re: Mapping question BIRGITTA . MOEHRING
- Re: Mapping question ftanare
- Mapping question Sebastian
- Re: Mapping question Sebastian
- RE: Mapping question Daniel Perry
- Re: Mapping question Sebastian
- RE: Mapping question Daniel Perry
