Oleg Nitz <on <at> ukr.net> writes:
> Hi Joerg,
>
> I think I have solved all the problems that you mentioned, and even more
> I confirm that otm-dependent="true" must be used with auto-update="false".
> Thank you very must for the ideal bug report!
>
> Regards,
> Oleg
Hello Oleg ... and also the other people,
I have tested your new code and it would work nicely if I would not want to use
it in another, maybe unexpected way :) The issues 2 and 3 are solved completely
for me, but not issue 1. I'm using OJB in combination with Cocoon Forms
framework aka Woody. Woody does the form binding to beans for me, at the end I
only want to tell OJB that it should update a modified bean to the database,
i.e. make the changes persistent.
That means that I don't do (1) open tx, (2) change object, (3) commit tx, but
(1) change object, (2) open tx, (3) make changes persistent, (4) commit tx.
Besides the deleting of objects this works wonderfully. If I really need to do
the changes in a transaction, I need a second (in this case debitor) object just
for setting all the changes. As it works for update without deleting in the
expected way this would be somewhat inconsistent.
Is the current behaviour now a bug or intended? For modifying the dependent test
2 I sent the patch to the test class below. With this change I can reproduce my
behaviour.
Regards,
Joerg
Index: src/test/org/apache/ojb/otm/DependentTests.java
===================================================================
RCS file:
/home/cvspublic/db-ojb/src/test/org/apache/ojb/otm/DependentTests.java,v
retrieving revision 1.3
diff -r1.3 DependentTests.java
180a181
> tx.commit();
183a185,188
>
> tx = _kit.getTransaction(_conn);
> tx.begin();
> _conn.makePersistent(debitor);
189a195
> assertTrue("person has correct type", (debitor.getAbstractPerson()
instanceof NaturalPerson));
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
