Re: Most Stable OJB version

[Laurie Harper]

Before you pronounce it stable, could you check my recent post (Querying 
on foreign key fields)? Unless I've made a Silly Mistake (TM), I think 
it describes a change in behaviour between OJB 0.9.7 and 1.0rc5. At 
least I'm pretty sure it used to work as I'm expecting. I'll try and put 
together a test case against the two different versions to properly 
confirm that.

L.

Brian McCallister wrote:

I expect an RC6 to be cut from cvs head as soon as I get around to 
verifying the ASL 2.0 stuff is all in place correctly. Assuming there 
are no major bugs in it, I believe the plan is to take RC6 to the pmc 
for a release vote in a week or two, and assuming the vote goes alright 
(no reason to expect otherwise) RC6 will be branched as 1.0.

RC5 is good, CVS HEAD is better as a couple bugs came up in RC5, I plan 
on finishing the ASL 2.0 stuff tuesday night, so we could theoretically 
push RC6 this week and hopefully only have 1.0 three months after our 
self-imposed deadline ;-)

-Brian

On Mar 15, 2004, at 6:24 AM, Antonio Gallardo wrote:

Chris Lewington dijo:

Hi all,

I'm planning to upgrade from version 0.9.7 (yes, I know that is rather
old but with some tweaking it has mostly worked for us). Can anyone
suggest the best upgrade? Obviously the CVS head is the most up to date,
but is rc4 or rc5 a better bet for stability right now?


I think the best stable is the CVS HEAD. Soon will be the 1.0 release.

Best Regards,

Antonio Gallardo

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]