On Wed, 21 Apr 2004, Guillaume Nodet wrote: > I thought i could replace the default implementation > of persistend field with my own, but i saw no way > of doing this for anonymous fields. Why is this class > not configurable along with the other ones in the > ojb configuration file ? I know my needs may be > very specific, but ...
This does not seem to be so simple as the two AnonymousField implementations are hardcoded in several places. Seems some refactoring of this part is in order. I'd do it but only if it is not urgent as I don't have any time to work on OJB in the next two weeks. Tom --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
