Should an exception be thrown when a delete is
requested on an object that doesn't exist in the
database? I think so, but the code currently does
nothing. Ideas and comments?
I see the following in JdbcAccessImpl.executeDelete():
// @todo: clearify semantics
// thma: the following check is not
secure. The object could be deleted *or* changed.
// if it was deleted it makes no sense to
throw an OL exception.
// does is make sense to throw an OL
exception if the object was changed?
if (stmt.executeUpdate() == 0 &&
cld.isLocking()) //BRJ
{
//throw new
OptimisticLockException("Object has been modified by
someone else", obj);
}
Thanks, Gary
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Win a $20,000 Career Makeover at Yahoo! HotJobs
http://hotjobs.sweepstakes.yahoo.com/careermakeover
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]