Hi Daniel,
I will fix this in doc. Thanks for the hint.
regards, Armin
Daniel Perry wrote:
Thanks. I thought this was the case. I also found the relevant part of the tutorial on the website...
"The classes participating in this relationship do not need to implement a special interface to be used in a collection proxy."
Might I suggest this is reworded to: do not need to implement any interfaces
As the "special interface" sounds to me like you're talking about a particular interface, rather than the JavaBean interfaces used for proxing individual objects...
Daniel.
-----Original Message----- From: Jakob Braeuchi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 20 May 2004 09:45 To: OJB Users List Subject: Re: Interfaces and collection-proxies
hi daniel,
when you use a collection-proxy tho whole collection is proxied so there's no need to define an interface for the contained classes.
hth jakob
Daniel Perry wrote:
I know that I need to use interfaces for classes if they are proxied individually, but if I am only proxying collections, do the items I am proxying need to implement any interfaces?
Thinking about it with hindsight, I would assume not, and I can
get rid of
dozens of needless interfaces! Can someone correct me if I'm wrong?
Thanks,
Daniel.
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
