Tino Schöllhorn wrote:
thanks now it works. But why do I have to map the attributes of the superclass in the subclass again? Is this intended or is the inheritance of descriptors a not yet enhancement?
Yes, this is by intention because you don't necessarily want to have all persistent fields of the superclass in the subclass. For the 1.1 we might make this a bit more comfortable by adding a flag to the class descriptor that defines whether the the features shall be inherited (with auto inheritance the default).
Tom
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
