Re: (xdoclet -> torque) with reference to interface

[Thomas Dudziak]

David Zejda wrote:
My scenario is simple:
MyInterface
MyAbstractClass implements MyInterface
MyClass extends MyAbstractClass
(and a few more subclasses)
where
-all of them are provided with ojb.class, mapped to the same table
-MyAbstractClass contains artificial primary key and ojbConcreteClass field
and several ojb.xxx (fields, refs., collections, nested..)
-MyClass contains MyClass() constructor and another ojb.xxx
I assume, this is not the special case, where the factory would be
necessary, is it?
 

I don't think so, no. Though if you're using the interface in a 
persistent relationship (e.g. as the referenced object in a persistent 
reference), then you have to declare in the interface getter/setter 
methods in the interface for at least the primary key and ojbConcreteClass
Also, the abstract class probably doesn't require the ojb.class tag 
unless you're referencing it somewhere else in the repository metadata.

Tom
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]