/**
* @ojb.class table="MEMBERSHIPS"
*/
public class MembershipImpl {/** * @ojb.field column="AGROUP" * jdbc-type="INTEGER" * primarykey="true" * required="true" */ private Integer groupId = null;
/** * @ojb.field column="MEMBER" * jdbc-type="INTEGER" * primarykey="true" * required="true" */ private Integer memberId = null;
/** * @ojb.reference class-ref="ContributorImpl" * foreignkey="memberId" * nullable="false" */ private ContributorImpl member; }
import java.util.*;
/** * @ojb.class table="CONTRIBUTORS" */
public class ContributorImpl {/** * @ojb.field column="ID" * jdbc-type="INTEGER" * primarykey="true" * required="true" */ private Integer id = null;
/** * @ojb.field column="CLASS" * jdbc-type="VARCHAR" * length="60" * nullable="false" */ private String ojbConcreteClass;
/** * @ojb.collection element-class-ref="MembershipImpl" * foreignkey="memberId" * orderby="groupId" * proxy="true" */ private List/*<MembershipImpl>*/ groups = new ArrayList(1); }
Now, what I find strange is that none of the snippets that you posted was actually using a ManageableCollection, neither in code nor in the XDoclet comment, so why should XDoclet try to search for it ?
Tom
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
