Re: urgent 3 level Inheritance problem

[Armin Waibel]

Ziv Yankowitz wrote:
one last question then,
if in AnonymousPersistentField i comment the putToFieldCache every thing seems 
to be working well, would you recommend I do it.
If all your tests pass ... try it. But I recommend to write tests to 
verify your improvement (as starting point you can use the test in the 
OJB test-suite ...odmg.InheritanceMultipleTableTest). Your changes will 
cause problems when you serialize the object, in this I assume case all 
anonymous field info is lost.

Armin
since we have also stress our application and it seems that the RefernceMap is 
not cleared leading to OutOfMemory in the end.
Thanks A Lot Ziv.

-----Original Message-----
From: Armin Waibel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 3:32 PM
To: OJB Users List
Subject: Re: urgent 3 level Inheritance problem
Ziv Yankowitz wrote:
Hi Armin,
so is there a way to avoid the caching of references even in the cost of 
performance?

think this is not possible, because the caching of the references is the 
character of the anonymous fields.

Armin

Thanks Ziv.
-----Original Message-----
From: Armin Waibel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 3:19 PM
To: OJB Users List
Subject: Re: urgent 3 level Inheritance problem
Hi Ziv,
it's a known issue that odmg-api does not support "mapping classes on 
multiple joined tables" (see release notes).
I will add some improvements to odmg-api today (hope so ;-)) which seems 
to solve the problems with inheritance (expect the one that is known in 
PB-api).

regards,
Armin
Ziv Yankowitz wrote:

Thanks for the response,
I tried to implement the hashCode and equals and it still doesn't work, somehow 
the beforeImage and the currentImage are working with the same instance of the 
AnonymousPersistentFieldForInheritance object in map.
Thanks Ziv
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 22, 2005 2:39 PM
To: OJB Users List
Subject: Re: urgent 3 level Inheritance problem
Ziv Yankowitz wrote:

is it possible to configure OJB not to store the references in a Map.

Without going into your detailed question; I think you should be able to 
work around any problems by implementing equals and hashCode in your 
beans such that <instance of A>.equals(<instance of B>) or <instance of 
A>.eqauls(<instance of C>) etc never returns true.

Regards,
Martin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]