Hi Wes,
Lemke, Wesley wrote:
Going to try this one more time.... :)
sorry for the delay!
>>Does the default Cache Impl in OJB 1.0.2 work with Optimistic locking?
yep!
> Anyone? Does the Open Symphony Cache handle multiple VMs where the > default impl in OJB doesn't?
yep, ObjectCacheDefaultImpl doesn't support multiple VM's, ObjectCachePerBrokerImpl hasn't a problem (because lifetime of cache, see docs), ObjectCacheTwoLevelImpl could use OsCache as second level cache.
What is the reason that Open Symphony's cache on the tutorial page for Optimistic Locking? Is it a suggestion or required?
Could you point me to the tutorial, I can't find it.
regards, Armin
-----Original Message-----
From: Lemke, Wesley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, May 02, 2005 8:27 AM
To: OJB Users List
Subject: RE: Is OSCache needed for Optimistic Locking?
Anyone? Does the Open Symphony Cache handle multiple VMs where the default impl in OJB doesn't? Is that the reason the Optimisitic Locking tutorial tells you to use Open Symphony?
-----Original Message-----
From: Lemke, Wesley Sent: Friday, April 29, 2005 9:01 AM
To: 'OJB Users List'
Subject: Is OSCache needed for Optimistic Locking?
Does the default Cache Impl in OJB 1.0.2 work with Optimistic locking?
We are having a problem when using the Os Cache implementation, but it
works fine with the default implementation. Before I try to figure out what's wrong, I was wondering if it would be ok to just use the Default Implementation.
Thanks, Wes
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
